<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phase 1: Local News Consolidation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matt.gehrisch.us/2009/03/12/phase-1-local-news-consolidation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matt.gehrisch.us/2009/03/12/phase-1-local-news-consolidation/</link>
	<description>Just a regular guy, living a regular life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://matt.gehrisch.us/2009/03/12/phase-1-local-news-consolidation/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt.gehrisch.us/?p=135#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I just found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/verizon_unveils_their_vision_for_the_web-connected.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article over at RWW&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s looks a little rough, but over time, these set top boxes will really mature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/verizon_unveils_their_vision_for_the_web-connected.php" rel="nofollow">this article over at RWW</a>.  It&#8217;s looks a little rough, but over time, these set top boxes will really mature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://matt.gehrisch.us/2009/03/12/phase-1-local-news-consolidation/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt.gehrisch.us/?p=135#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Hey, what&#039;s your twitter ID? I&#039;ll follow you! :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, what&#8217;s your twitter ID? I&#8217;ll follow you! <img src='http://matt.gehrisch.us/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://matt.gehrisch.us/2009/03/12/phase-1-local-news-consolidation/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt.gehrisch.us/?p=135#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Of all the outlets in Columbus, I think WBNS is in the best position to create an internet arm.  They already have business units for print, TV, and radio.  It shouldn&#039;t be much of a stretch to create a business unit for Internet media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the outlets in Columbus, I think WBNS is in the best position to create an internet arm.  They already have business units for print, TV, and radio.  It shouldn&#8217;t be much of a stretch to create a business unit for Internet media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morning Toast</title>
		<link>http://matt.gehrisch.us/2009/03/12/phase-1-local-news-consolidation/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt.gehrisch.us/?p=135#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t disagree that the news business model is busted. The broadcast situation is changing due to all the new outlets as you covered. Your prediction may still come true but...

...the reason they are consolidating NOW is due to the economy. If the country hadn&#039;t tanked, all these TV stations would have kept on truckin&#039; as they always have.

The economy just sped up reality for these stations. I don&#039;t believe any of the stations in our town know how to cope with the new technology (web, mobile, direct, dvr, etc). Despite their focus groups, they are determined to hang on to the Blue Hair demo as long as possible. What they don&#039;t seem to understand is they need to work now at building the framework to serve the young demo while ALSO continuing to serve the old demo. If they did then when that demo-change happens (read, the older ones finally die) they&#039;d be prepared.

What I don&#039;t understand in this specific case is why do you want to help your competition? Assuming NBC4 has more bank than ABC6, if I was 4 I&#039;d let 6 suffer. One less person to worry about. But the effects of lack of competition is another article and debate for another time...

Or, option C is to follow in the steps of many of the failing papers...just move to an all on-line model. Cut clean from the Blue Hairs and go where the bulk of people are.

Eitherway, I&#039;m looking forward to seeing what outlets/companies survive or are created out of the ashes of the old guard. You gotta clear cut the forest to let new trees grow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree that the news business model is busted. The broadcast situation is changing due to all the new outlets as you covered. Your prediction may still come true but&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;the reason they are consolidating NOW is due to the economy. If the country hadn&#8217;t tanked, all these TV stations would have kept on truckin&#8217; as they always have.</p>
<p>The economy just sped up reality for these stations. I don&#8217;t believe any of the stations in our town know how to cope with the new technology (web, mobile, direct, dvr, etc). Despite their focus groups, they are determined to hang on to the Blue Hair demo as long as possible. What they don&#8217;t seem to understand is they need to work now at building the framework to serve the young demo while ALSO continuing to serve the old demo. If they did then when that demo-change happens (read, the older ones finally die) they&#8217;d be prepared.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t understand in this specific case is why do you want to help your competition? Assuming NBC4 has more bank than ABC6, if I was 4 I&#8217;d let 6 suffer. One less person to worry about. But the effects of lack of competition is another article and debate for another time&#8230;</p>
<p>Or, option C is to follow in the steps of many of the failing papers&#8230;just move to an all on-line model. Cut clean from the Blue Hairs and go where the bulk of people are.</p>
<p>Eitherway, I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing what outlets/companies survive or are created out of the ashes of the old guard. You gotta clear cut the forest to let new trees grow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

